The intricacies of the grant evaluation process are akin to the complexities of a well-staged symphony. Each element, each note, each instrument must flawlessly work in concert to produce the desired outcome - the approval of a grant proposal. An integral part of this harmonious process is the role of the grant evaluator, the maestro orchestrating the evaluation process, whose expertise and judgments can make or break a grant application.

When we set out to engage a grant evaluator, it is crucial to ensure their skills, experience, and methodologies align with our objectives. Just like the conductor's baton that guides an orchestra through a symphony, the right questions can guide us to the perfect grant evaluator. Hence, it's imperative to focus on four essential areas of enquiry.

Firstly, we need to delve into the evaluator's understanding of the grant evaluation ecosystem. This requires them to have an in-depth knowledge of the different evaluation models and paradigms, such as the Systems Change Evaluation or the Utilization-Focused Evaluation models. It's about their ability to skillfully navigate these models, applying them judiciously, and intuitively adapting them to meet specific grant objectives. For instance, a grant evaluator using the Participatory Evaluation model must be able to elicit active involvement from all stakeholders, cultivating a sense of ownership and engagement.

Secondly, we should probe the evaluator's capacity to handle data. We live in an era where the power of big data analytics can be leveraged to enrich grant evaluation processes, resulting in more nuanced and robust evaluations. The evaluator should possess a keen understanding of data science and statistics, to extract meaningful insights from vast amounts of data. Furthermore, they need to be well-versed in using sophisticated data analytics tools and software, which can help in predictive modeling, trend analysis, and so on.

The third line of enquiry revolves around the evaluator's ability to provide clear, actionable recommendations based on the evaluation findings. In essence, they should act as a strategic partner and not just an analyst. They need to provide strategic advice that is firmly grounded in the evaluation outcomes, enabling the organization to leverage these insights for better grant outcomes. Hence, the application of concepts from strategic management is of paramount importance in this regard.

Finally, the fourth area of enquiry pertains to the evaluator's ability to communicate effectively. Regardless of their technical prowess, their insights would be of little value if they cannot communicate them effectively to both technical and non-technical stakeholders. This entails the ability to articulate complex findings in simple, clear terms, making them accessible and understandable to all stakeholders.

Drawing from the annals of game theory, we can equate this process to the 'Prisoner's Dilemma'. The grant evaluator and the organization are the two 'prisoners', with their shared objective being the approval of the grant application. Their success hinges on their ability to effectively collaborate and understand each other's perspectives, thus avoiding the 'dilemma' of misalignment and misunderstanding.

In conclusion, the process of selecting a grant evaluator is akin to a strategic game, one that involves a deep understanding of the evaluation ecosystem, data analytics, strategic management, and effective communication. By ensuring that the chosen evaluator excels in these areas, we can orchestrate a symphony of success in the world of grant evaluations.